Go to the mobile version of gosanangelo.com . |
Login | Manage My Profile | Contact Us | Site Map | Archives | Subscription Services | Subscribe to the Paper | Place a Classified Ad

HomeNewsLocal News

Treasurer fined, Vasquez cleared in ethics probe

The Texas Ethics Commission has cleared San Ange­lo Police Chief Tim Vasquez of intentional wrongdoing in the sending of fundraising letters on Town & Country corporate letterhead but fined his campaign treasurer, then-T&C chief financial officer Devin Bates, $500.

The commission, in a decision filed Nov. 13, found Bates violated election law by twice sending the let­ters using the Town & Country logo, and by using T&C resources to do so in the months before the May police chief election won by Vasquez.

“There is credible evidence that the respondent ( Bates) made an unlawful political contribution us­ing corporate property,” the commission found, add­ing later, “There is credible evidence that the respon­dent used T&C’s assets to make a political contribu­tion in the form of postage without making a proper reimbursement.”

The letters came to light when a pair of San Angelo residents — political activist Jim Ryan and concert promoter Blaine Martin — filed complaints with the commission in February and March.

Bates signed the commission’s findings, agreeing to pay the fine, but, “ The respondent neither admits nor denies the facts … or the commission’s findings and conclusions of law.”

Indeed, Bates said he disagrees with the commis­sion’s findings, but that it was cheaper and easier to pay the fine than to fight the ruling.

“I just wanted to get this deal behind me and allow Tim to get on doing the great job he’s doing for the city,” Bates said.

Vasquez, who already received a measure of vindi­cation when voters gave him a straight-majority win over five challengers in May, was essentially cleared of intentional wrongdoing by the commission.

“I know Devin very well,” he said. “Devin didn’t do anything inten­tional to make it look like Town & Country endorsed me. I am proud to have him as my treasurer.”

Bates sent two mailings — the first, dated May 22, 2007, consisted of 98 letters, while the second was dated Jan. 29 and consisted of 240 letters — on letterhead that featured the Town & Coun­try logo but an out-of-date title for Bates and an old phone number. He char­acterized the letterhead to the Ethics Commission as “obsolete,” something the company had given him to use as his personal statio­nery.

The commission reject­ed that argument, saying the logo itself has value, and that its trademark had been renewed as recently as December 2007, proving that the company thought so, too, even after being sold that September to Cor­pus Christi-based Susser Holdings Inc., which is in the process of re-branding all the Town & Country stores into Stripes.

The decision closes the case for Ryan and Martin; both men said they felt the ruling is appropriate.

“They didn’t hit him real hard,” Ryan said. “They found a few of his holdings a little dubious. They pretty much found that what Devin was doing he knew he shouldn’t have done.”

Martin, who keeps a house in San Angelo but now lives mainly in Ar­lington, has made no se­cret of his motives, filing the complaint in retalia­tion for what he has said was unfair treatment by the San Angelo Police De­partment toward his San Angelo Picnic, which has since left town.

Ryan, on the other hand, said he voted for Vasquez in 2003 , but that the letters posed a significant prob­lem for him.

“You are a vendor who sells stuff at Town & Coun­try stores,” and they are your No. 1 client, Ryan said. “You get this letter on Town & Country let­terhead. … If you’re a wise and intelligent vendor, you’ll probably write a personal check to the cam­paign. This is just fraught with the possibility of pres­sure. That’s pretty much what the election code was written to prevent.”

There are 4 responses to this story. Click here to join the conversation

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned.

Click here for our full user agreement.

4 Comments (hide comments)
You must follow these rules in order to post comments:
  1. Keep it on topic. Comments that are obscene, vulgar, lewd or sexually-oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms also will be filtered out and banned.
  2. Do not threaten to hurt or kill anyone. Not only is this illegal, but violates our user agreement.
  3. Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Exposing untruthful things is not what comments are about.
  4. Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  5. Keep it local. Do not post direct links to sites outside of gosanangelo.com.
  6. Police yourselves. Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments. We, in turn, will take a look at your issue with a particular comment and remove it if it violates our user agreement.
  7. Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history. You are our eyes and ears in the Concho Valley.
  8. Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story? We can then forward your question to the appropriate person and have them give you a response.
  9. Help us get it right. If you find a factual error or misspelling within one of our stories, email webmaster@gosanangelo.com before slamming the writer and newspaper.
  10. Gosanangelo.com reserves the right to suspend the comments function without prior notification, including but not limited to: repeated violations of the user agreement, conversations straying off topic, and/or protection of minors.
By following these simple rules, we can keep comments alive and allow you, our residents and loyal readers, the privilege of being able to voice opinions on local issues.

Click here for our full user agreement.

Posted by webcop2 on November 24, 2008 at 7:53 a.m.

Gee amazing little timmy's friend at the newspaper wrote this. Same staff writer that trys to do damage control on all of little timmy's wrong doing.
Bate's sorry to see that you were the patsy in this whole mess, several officers and I almost laid bets that something like this would happen. Hope the fine isn't more than you can afford, we know that little timmy didn't pay for the supplies and he won't be helping with the fines either.

Posted by barkeep on November 24, 2008 at 7:02 p.m.

in response to webcop2

webcop2; I know you know who I am, Jim Ryan. I'm telling you, this characterization of Anthony is unfair, to put it mildly.

I'm the guy in the middle, having made the complaint. It took longer than I had anticipated, but I am satisfied with the result.

Anthony's article took my primary objection, the potential of pressuring donors was way more important than the piddling sum of money involved.

Posted by pz on November 24, 2008 at 9:14 p.m.

in response to webcop2

Did you win your bets?

Posted by webcop2 on November 25, 2008 at 10:56 a.m.

in response to pz

Yes pz I did, I knew Little timmy would make Bates take the blame.



Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgot your password?)

Your Turn: